El diario El Mundo iniciaba ayer domingo una serie de entrevistas con los primeros espadas de la asesoría en comunicación política. Tras la entrevista a Antonio Sola, el padre de la niña de Rajoy, el diario publica hoy una entrevista con Dick Morris, el consultor político de Bill Clinton en la campaña presidencial de 1996. Mañana será el turno de Juan José Rendón, discípulo de Joe Napolitan.
###
lunes, septiembre 19, 2011
El Mundo entrevista a las estrellas de la consultoría política
Etiquetas:
comunicacion política,
comunicacionpolitica,
elmundo,
political communication,
politicalcommunication
miércoles, septiembre 14, 2011
Los discursos del poder: Congreso en Cuenca
Dice el maestro Jay Blumler que en democracia el acceso al poder se produce mediante la persuasión y la comunicación, de ahí el papel fundamental del discurso y sus mediaciones en la conquista de un gobierno. Del 23 al 25 de noviembre la Facultad de Periodismo de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha en Cuenca se convertirá en la sede del un congreso de semiótica cuya temática principal girará en torno al discurso y el poder. Encabeza el plantel de participantes Paolo Fabbri, discípulo de Umberto Eco y director del Laboratorio Internacional de Semiótica de Venecia. Los interesados en presentar una ponencia tienen hasta el 23 de septiembre para enviar sus propuestas.
Más información en la web del congreso.
###
Más información en la web del congreso.
###
Etiquetas:
comunicación política,
comunicacionpolitica,
cuenca,
paolofabbri,
political communication,
politicalcommunication,
semiología,
semiology,
semiótica,
semiotics,
uclm
lunes, septiembre 12, 2011
IE University lanza un máster en Comunicación Política
IE University, la universidad que nació de la escuela de negocios del Instituto de Empresa y amplió su oferta académica tras la compra de la Universidad SEK de Segovia, lanza un máster en Comunicación Política. De 10 meses de duración e impartido en inglés, el programa comenzará en octubre de 2012 y se desarrollará en Madrid. Los interesados en cursar este máster ya pueden tramitar sus solicitudes de admisión a través de Internet. Deben ser graduados o licenciados y demostrar un buen dominio del inglés.
El programa se estructura en cuatro módulos: Fundamentos de la Comunicación Política, Opinión Pública, Campañas Políticas y Consultoría, y Comunicación en las Instituciones Públicas. A todo ello se suma un proyecto final de dos meses y medio de duración, en el que se realizarán estudios de caso o informes de consultoría para partidos políticos, ONGs o grupos de presión de carácter local, nacional o internacional.
IE University ofrece en la actualidad un grado (Bachelor) en Comunicación en su campus de Segovia, impartido en español e inglés. El lanzamiento de este máster en Comunicación Política (al que se unen otras tres nuevas maestrías en el área de periodismo y comunicación) se enmarca dentro de la estrategia de IE University de convertirse en una universidad de posgrado e internacional, apostando por Madrid como ciudad global.
###
El programa se estructura en cuatro módulos: Fundamentos de la Comunicación Política, Opinión Pública, Campañas Políticas y Consultoría, y Comunicación en las Instituciones Públicas. A todo ello se suma un proyecto final de dos meses y medio de duración, en el que se realizarán estudios de caso o informes de consultoría para partidos políticos, ONGs o grupos de presión de carácter local, nacional o internacional.
IE University ofrece en la actualidad un grado (Bachelor) en Comunicación en su campus de Segovia, impartido en español e inglés. El lanzamiento de este máster en Comunicación Política (al que se unen otras tres nuevas maestrías en el área de periodismo y comunicación) se enmarca dentro de la estrategia de IE University de convertirse en una universidad de posgrado e internacional, apostando por Madrid como ciudad global.
###
Etiquetas:
comunicacion política,
comunicacionpolitica,
ie,
IE Universidad,
IE University,
ieuniversidad,
ieuniversity,
political communication,
politicalcommunication
viernes, septiembre 09, 2011
Programa de ECREA en Madrid
La principal asociación europea de investigadores en comunicación, ECREA, celebrará la conferencia de su sección de Comunicación en Política en Madrid, bajo el título “Comparing political communication across time and space”, los días 20 y 21 de octubre en la Facultad de Ciencias de la Información de la Complutense. Las sesiones se retransmitirán en directo a través de Internet. El programa, que reproducimos a continuación, puede consultarse online en la web de la Asociación de Comunicación Política, la anfitriona del simposio.
CONFERENCE OF THE ECREA POLITICAL COMMUNICATION SECTION
COMPARING POLITICAL COMMUNICATION ACROSS TIME AND SPACE
20TH and 21ST October, 2011, MADRID.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Avda. Complutense s/n,
Facultad Ciencias de la Información
PROGRAMME
Thursday 20th October
12.00 Registration.
12.45 Welcome/Introduction
13.00 PLENARY PANEL 1. Communicating politics: professionalization and popularization
Popularization of politics: a comparative analysis
What factors explain the professionalization of political campaigning? Evidence from a comparison between Swiss cantonal elections
Dissolved politics: Trends in televised leaders’ debates reports in Canada, 1968-2008
A comparative perspective in government communication? Looking at government communication across 13 countries
14.15 PLENARY PANEL 2. Role perceptions and performance of journalists
Chair: María José Canel, Madrid Complutense University. mjcanel@ccinf.ucm.es
Journalists’ trust in public institutions in 18 Countries
Making sense of press freedom. A comparison of journalists’ interpretations of press freedom in six new democracies
Perceptions of journalists on the political agenda-setting power of the media in comparative perspective
A comparison of interpretative political journalism in Swedish election campaigns 1998-2010
15.30 Coffee break
16.00 PARALLEL PANEL 3. The mediatisation of political institutions.
Comparing newspaper coverage of parliaments across time and space
Studying the tango: A longitudinal analysis of parliamentary questions and media coverage in the Netherlands
Powerful but communicative as well? Similarities and differences in the communicative relationship between the administration and the media in Germany and Switzerland.
How much does communication matter? A comparison between strategies of Italian governments: 2001-2011
16.00 PARALLEL PANEL 4. Constructed realities and public attention.
Room: 542, 5th floor, Old Building Facultad de Ciencias de la Información. See map for indications.
The impact of different political and media systems on European TV programs
Good old days or bright futures? A discursive reconstruction of the structural transformation of the British public sphere 1960-2005
A case of identity: The role of political culture proximity in international newsworthiness
Tracing differences in media logic: A comparative content analysis of newspapers across six democracies and five decades
17.15 PARALLEL PANEL 5. Campaign images and campaign agendas.
Marketing the candidate. Personalization in election posters in Austrian national election campaigns, 1945 – 2008
New perspectives on agenda formation: Agenda building processes during election campaigns in Austria, 1970-2008
Mapping political reporting styles. The struggle between journalist-centered and politician-centered election communication in the United States, Great Britain, Denmark, Germany, Switzerland, France, Italy, and Spain
U.S. and international coverage of the election of Barack Obama: Trends and differences
17.15 PARALLEL PANEL 6. Changing technologies-changing politics?
Room: 542, 5th floor, Old Building Facultad de Ciencias de la Información. See map for indications.
Institutionalized political change and mobile phones: Exploring global trends and linkages from the post-war era through the information age
Comparing online politics: Parties’ and candidates’ websites in seven Western democracies (2006-2010)
The effect of elections on the digitisation of political communication. A panel study looking for the role of political interest and cognitive mobilisation
18.30 End of day one
Friday 21st October
9.30 PLENARY KEY NOTE: Promise fulfilled? Comparative research in political communication systems.
10.30 PLENARY PANEL 7. Audience responses to political messages
Chair: Claes de Vreese, Claes De Vreese, University of Amsterdam, c.h.devreese@uva.nl
Candidate‐voting revisited. A longitudinal analysis of individual media usage and voting behaviour
Direct democracy and political socialization: Comparing Switzerland and the Netherlands
Youth conceptions on elections and mediated democracy: what patterns reveals timeline?
The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: A longitudinal perspective
11.45 Coffee break
12.15 Business Meeting
13.15 Lunch. Restaurante Museo del Traje. See map for indications.
15.00 PARALLEL PANEL 8. The mediatisation of European elections.
Across time and space. Explaining over-time and cross-country variations in the coverage of European Elections
Framing Europe: A cross-cultural analysis of party-political broadcasts for the 2009 EU elections
Transformations in second-order campaigning: A German-Finnish comparison on the occasion of the European parliamentary elections 2004 and 2009
Between European and national public spheres: The Euroelections 2009 in British and German quality newspapers
15.00 PARALLEL PANEL 9. Crossing borders: Transnational communications and transnational connections.
Room: 542, 5th floor, Old Building Facultad de Ciencias de la Información. See map for indications.
In or out? A cross-national comparative newspaper analysis of reciprocal perceptions between Western Balkan countries and the EU against the background of a future EU accession
City-diplomacy in the EU context
Mediating alliance: The role of the press in sustaining reciprocity in the US-Canada relationship
Migrant minority media in Madrid and London: political actors in the migratory transnational field
16.15 Coffee Break
16.30 PLENARY PANEL 10. The art of comparing political communication: methodological issues.
Political vs. media logic or simply different worlds? A typology of political communication cultures across Europe
Media attention cycles
Politicians’ peccadilloes in comparative context: Using fuzzy set qualitative case analysis (fsQCA) to explain the frequency of political sex scandals in eight democracies
5.45 Final Remarks
6.00 End of workshop
###
CONFERENCE OF THE ECREA POLITICAL COMMUNICATION SECTION
COMPARING POLITICAL COMMUNICATION ACROSS TIME AND SPACE
20TH and 21ST October, 2011, MADRID.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Avda. Complutense s/n,
Facultad Ciencias de la Información
PROGRAMME
Thursday 20th October
12.00 Registration.
12.45 Welcome/Introduction
13.00 PLENARY PANEL 1. Communicating politics: professionalization and popularization
- Chair: Jesper Strömback, Mid Sweden University, stromback@miun.se
Popularization of politics: a comparative analysis
- Gianpietro Mazzoleni, Università degli Studi di Milano
- Patricia Moy, University of Washington
- Michael Xenos, University of Wisconsin-Madison
What factors explain the professionalization of political campaigning? Evidence from a comparison between Swiss cantonal elections
- Stefanie Knocks, University of Bern
Dissolved politics: Trends in televised leaders’ debates reports in Canada, 1968-2008
- Frederick Bastien, Laval University
A comparative perspective in government communication? Looking at government communication across 13 countries
- María José Canel, Madrid Complutense University
- Karen Sanders, CEU San Pablo University
14.15 PLENARY PANEL 2. Role perceptions and performance of journalists
Chair: María José Canel, Madrid Complutense University. mjcanel@ccinf.ucm.es
Journalists’ trust in public institutions in 18 Countries
- Rosa Berganza, University Rey Juan Carlos
- Thomas Hanitzsch, University of Munich
Making sense of press freedom. A comparison of journalists’ interpretations of press freedom in six new democracies
- Katrin Voltmer, University of Leeds
Perceptions of journalists on the political agenda-setting power of the media in comparative perspective
- Peter Van Aelst, University of Antwerp/Leiden University
- Arjen Van Dalen, University of Southern Denmark
A comparison of interpretative political journalism in Swedish election campaigns 1998-2010
- Lars Nord, Mid Sweden University
- Jesper Strömbäck, Mid Sweden University
15.30 Coffee break
16.00 PARALLEL PANEL 3. The mediatisation of political institutions.
- Chair: Magdalena Wojcieszak, IE School of Communication, Madrid, Magdalena.Wojcieszak@ie.edu
Comparing newspaper coverage of parliaments across time and space
- Rene Jainsch, Dresden University of Technology
Studying the tango: A longitudinal analysis of parliamentary questions and media coverage in the Netherlands
- Peter Van Aelst, University of Antwerp/Leiden University
- Rens Vliegenthart, University of Amsterdam
Powerful but communicative as well? Similarities and differences in the communicative relationship between the administration and the media in Germany and Switzerland.
- Marlis Prinzing, Macromedia University for Media and Communication
How much does communication matter? A comparison between strategies of Italian governments: 2001-2011
- Giuliano Bobba, University of Turin.
16.00 PARALLEL PANEL 4. Constructed realities and public attention.
Room: 542, 5th floor, Old Building Facultad de Ciencias de la Información. See map for indications.
- Chair: Guillermo Velasco, Universidad Panamericana Guadalajara, México, jgvelas@up.edu.mx
The impact of different political and media systems on European TV programs
- Steffen Kolb, University of Fribourg
Good old days or bright futures? A discursive reconstruction of the structural transformation of the British public sphere 1960-2005
- Thomas Haeussler, University of Bern
A case of identity: The role of political culture proximity in international newsworthiness
- Tamir Sheafer, Hebrew University
- Shaul Shenhav, Hebrew University
- Elad Segev, Tel Aviv University
- Janet Takens, VU University Amsterdam
Tracing differences in media logic: A comparative content analysis of newspapers across six democracies and five decades
- Frank Esser, University of Zurich
- Andrea Umbricht, University of Zurich
17.15 PARALLEL PANEL 5. Campaign images and campaign agendas.
- Chair: Gianpietro Mazzoleni. University of Milan. gianpietro.mazzoleni@unimi.it
Marketing the candidate. Personalization in election posters in Austrian national election campaigns, 1945 – 2008
- Lore Hayek, University of Innsbruck
New perspectives on agenda formation: Agenda building processes during election campaigns in Austria, 1970-2008
- Gabriele Melischek, Commission for Comparative Media and Communication Studies, Austria
- Josef Seethaler, Commission for Comparative Media and Communication Studies, Austria
Mapping political reporting styles. The struggle between journalist-centered and politician-centered election communication in the United States, Great Britain, Denmark, Germany, Switzerland, France, Italy, and Spain
- Frank Esser, University of Zurich
- Florin Buechel, University of Zurich
U.S. and international coverage of the election of Barack Obama: Trends and differences
- Salma Ghanem, Central Michigan University
17.15 PARALLEL PANEL 6. Changing technologies-changing politics?
Room: 542, 5th floor, Old Building Facultad de Ciencias de la Información. See map for indications.
- Chair: Pablo López Rabadan, Universidad Jaume I, rabadan@com.uji.es
Institutionalized political change and mobile phones: Exploring global trends and linkages from the post-war era through the information age
- Jacob Groshek, Erasmus University Rotterdam
- Alex Farivar, University of Michigan
Comparing online politics: Parties’ and candidates’ websites in seven Western democracies (2006-2010)
- Cristian Vaccari, University of Bologna
The effect of elections on the digitisation of political communication. A panel study looking for the role of political interest and cognitive mobilisation
- Pablo Porten, Ilmenau University of Technology, Germany
- Jens Wolling, Ilmenau University of Technology, Germany
18.30 End of day one
Friday 21st October
9.30 PLENARY KEY NOTE: Promise fulfilled? Comparative research in political communication systems.
- Speaker: Barbara Pfetsch. Free University of Berlin
- Chair: Katrin Voltmer, University of Leeds
10.30 PLENARY PANEL 7. Audience responses to political messages
Chair: Claes de Vreese, Claes De Vreese, University of Amsterdam, c.h.devreese@uva.nl
Candidate‐voting revisited. A longitudinal analysis of individual media usage and voting behaviour
- Reimar Zeh, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Direct democracy and political socialization: Comparing Switzerland and the Netherlands
- Judith Möller, University of Zürich
- Ruth Kunz, University of Zürich
- Frank Esser, University of Zürich
- Claes De Vreese, University of Amsterdam
Youth conceptions on elections and mediated democracy: what patterns reveals timeline?
- María José Brites, Universidade Nova de Lisboa
- Cristina Ponte, Universidade Nova de Lisboa
- Isabel Menezes, Universidade do Porto
The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: A longitudinal perspective
- Jesper Strömbäck, Mid Sweden University
- Monika Djerf-Pierre, University of Gothenburg
- Adam Shehata, Mid Sweden University
11.45 Coffee break
12.15 Business Meeting
13.15 Lunch. Restaurante Museo del Traje. See map for indications.
15.00 PARALLEL PANEL 8. The mediatisation of European elections.
- Chair: Frank Esser, University of Zurich, f.esser@ipmz.uzh.ch
Across time and space. Explaining over-time and cross-country variations in the coverage of European Elections
- Hajo Boomgaarden, University of Amsterdam
- Claes de Vreese, University of Amsterdam
- Andreas Schuck, University of Amsterdam
- Matthijs Elenbaas, University of Amsterdam
- Rachid Azrout, University of Amsterdam
- Rens Vliegenthart, University of Amsterdam
- Joost Van Spanje, University of Amsterdam
Framing Europe: A cross-cultural analysis of party-political broadcasts for the 2009 EU elections
- Manon Van der Laaken, University of Amsterdam
Transformations in second-order campaigning: A German-Finnish comparison on the occasion of the European parliamentary elections 2004 and 2009
- Jens Tenscher, Universität Augsburg
- Tom Moring, University of Helsinki
- Juri Mykkänen, University of Helsinki
Between European and national public spheres: The Euroelections 2009 in British and German quality newspapers
- Hannanh Middendorf, University of Muenster
15.00 PARALLEL PANEL 9. Crossing borders: Transnational communications and transnational connections.
Room: 542, 5th floor, Old Building Facultad de Ciencias de la Información. See map for indications.
- Chair: Andreu Casero Ripollés, Universidad Jaume I, casero@com.uji.es
In or out? A cross-national comparative newspaper analysis of reciprocal perceptions between Western Balkan countries and the EU against the background of a future EU accession
- Romy Wohlert, Austrian Academy of Sciences
City-diplomacy in the EU context
- Teresa La Porte, Universidad de Navarra
Mediating alliance: The role of the press in sustaining reciprocity in the US-Canada relationship
- Katherine Dunsmore, Fairleigh Dickinson University NJ
Migrant minority media in Madrid and London: political actors in the migratory transnational field
- Alicia Ferrández Ferrer, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
16.15 Coffee Break
16.30 PLENARY PANEL 10. The art of comparing political communication: methodological issues.
- Chair: Barbara Pfetsch. Free University of Berlin. pfetsch@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Political vs. media logic or simply different worlds? A typology of political communication cultures across Europe
- Barbara Pfetsch, Freie Universität Berlin
- Eva Mayerhöffer, Freie Universität Berlin
- Tom Moring, University of Helsinki
Media attention cycles
- Steffen Kolb, University of Fribourg
- Sünje Paasch-Colberg, University of Fribourg
Politicians’ peccadilloes in comparative context: Using fuzzy set qualitative case analysis (fsQCA) to explain the frequency of political sex scandals in eight democracies
- James Stanyer, Loughborough University
- John Downey, Loughborough University
5.45 Final Remarks
6.00 End of workshop
###
Etiquetas:
acop,
comunicación política,
comunicacionpolitica,
ECREA,
political communication,
politicalcommunication,
ucm
jueves, septiembre 08, 2011
Internet: ¿Buena o mala para el periodismo?
El pasado 9 de julio la revista The Economist publicaba un informe especial sobre la industria periodística. En él su autor, Tom Sandage, sostenía que Internet ha desmasificado los medios de comunicación, favoreciendo una politización de la prensa propia del siglo XIX. Idéntica idea a la defendida por William Powers en The Atlantic hace algunos años. Durante los días siguientes a la publicación del informe, la web de The Economist abrió un debate en el que se enfrentaban Jay Rosen, profesor de periodismo en la Universidad de Nueva York y defensor del reporterismo ciudadano en Internet, y Nicholas Carr, escritor que lamenta la desaparición del periodista profesional porque la red habría atacado la línea de flotación del modelo de negocio de la prensa tradicional. El debate se abrió a los lectores, cuyos votos se inclinaron mayoritariamente por la posición de Rosen.
En el informe de The Economist se cita un reciente libro publicado por el Reuters Institute de la Universidad de Oxford, The changing business of journalism and its implications for democracy. El resumen ejecutivo puede consultarse online.
###
Etiquetas:
comunicación política,
comunicacionpolitica,
economist,
journalism,
periodismo,
political communication,
politicalcommunication
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)